How do they Compare?

Traditional BIND v. Community DNS Anycast System

  Managed/Shared Community DNS Service Traditional DNS Approach (in-house)
Security
  • Super fast resolution for DDoS mitigation
  • No Recursion
  • Limited resolution rates
  • Prone to DNS hijaking and spoofing
Stability
  • Each DNS Operator controls its own zones and data
  • AnyCast from multiple nodes, clustering and load balancing
  • Grace and favour secondary service frequently limits DNS Operator control of its data and zones
  • No load balancing making the system vulnerable to DDoS attacks
Performance
  • Updates take less than 4 minutes between DNS Operator and Community DNS resolution nodes
  • Fast disaster recovery - 1 million+ names per minute database reload
  • Long time to load changes, round-robin selection of Name Server
  • Limited and slow disaster recovery
Quality of Service
  • SLA with 99.999% network uptime guarantee
  • No SLA
  • Best efforts support
Scalability
  • Current system tested to 500 million names, and footprint expanding continuously
  • Easy upscale path
  • Limits on scalability, extended roll-out time
  • DNS Operator must make ongoing financial and human investment to meet increasing demands